<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barack Obama is a thug, part 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.billoblog.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325</link>
	<description>It was bound to happen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20576</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20576</guid>
		<description>&quot;McCain is just leaving this guy out to dry. &quot;

That&#039;s rich.  It&#039;s not the Obamafascists who are wrong, it&#039;s McCain for not stopping the Obamafascists.

Heh.

Yeah, any tax is a good tax -- to Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;McCain is just leaving this guy out to dry. &#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s rich.  It&#8217;s not the Obamafascists who are wrong, it&#8217;s McCain for not stopping the Obamafascists.</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
<p>Yeah, any tax is a good tax &#8212; to Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20566</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20566</guid>
		<description>McCain still talking about Joe the Plumber.  McCain is just leaving this guy out to dry.  

And, news flash...unless you&#039;re a flat tax proponent, you&#039;re for *spreading around the wealth* too.  The well-off pay more than the not-so-well-off.  250K+ers will go from 36% to 39.6%  Consider the difference going to buying essentials for the troops or, gasp, paying for the Iraq war. Let&#039;s call the 3.6% the *Patriot&#039;s tax*  LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain still talking about Joe the Plumber.  McCain is just leaving this guy out to dry.  </p>
<p>And, news flash&#8230;unless you&#8217;re a flat tax proponent, you&#8217;re for *spreading around the wealth* too.  The well-off pay more than the not-so-well-off.  250K+ers will go from 36% to 39.6%  Consider the difference going to buying essentials for the troops or, gasp, paying for the Iraq war. Let&#8217;s call the 3.6% the *Patriot&#8217;s tax*  LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20504</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20504</guid>
		<description>&quot;When I saw the video they were both standing well away from any houses, more like in a crowd in the street.&quot;

I don&#039;t understand what point you are trying to make.  Obama was going from house to house.

According to the Toledo Blade -- hardly a McCain-friendly
&quot;Mr.Wurzelbacher and Mr. Obama had something of a debate Sunday as the candidate walked house to house on Shrewsbury at the start of the candidate&#039;s four-day visit in the Toledo area.&quot;

See: http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081016/NEWS09/810160418

I guess there is life outside YouTube.

It was an unforced error because it was so bald, and it was individual.  It&#039;s one thing to opine in abstracts about vague socialist theory.  It&#039;s another to go so some poor bastard that say that you are going to take away his money in order to share the wealth.

The attacks on Mr. Wurzelbacher started well before McCain used him as a campaign icon.

You can&#039;t blame the attacks made on the man by Obama, by Biden, and by the Democrat pols as &quot;the media.&quot;  It&#039;s Obamafascism at its finest.

But just wait.  An Obama administration will have even less taste for individual liberties than the Clinton one.  If you liked Waco and Ruby Ridge, you are going to love it when Obama decides to take people down.  He&#039;s got the integrity of Clinton, but with the arrogance and competence of Carter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When I saw the video they were both standing well away from any houses, more like in a crowd in the street.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand what point you are trying to make.  Obama was going from house to house.</p>
<p>According to the Toledo Blade &#8212; hardly a McCain-friendly<br />
&#8220;Mr.Wurzelbacher and Mr. Obama had something of a debate Sunday as the candidate walked house to house on Shrewsbury at the start of the candidate&#8217;s four-day visit in the Toledo area.&#8221;</p>
<p>See: <a href="http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081016/NEWS09/810160418" rel="nofollow">http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081016/NEWS09/810160418</a></p>
<p>I guess there is life outside YouTube.</p>
<p>It was an unforced error because it was so bald, and it was individual.  It&#8217;s one thing to opine in abstracts about vague socialist theory.  It&#8217;s another to go so some poor bastard that say that you are going to take away his money in order to share the wealth.</p>
<p>The attacks on Mr. Wurzelbacher started well before McCain used him as a campaign icon.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t blame the attacks made on the man by Obama, by Biden, and by the Democrat pols as &#8220;the media.&#8221;  It&#8217;s Obamafascism at its finest.</p>
<p>But just wait.  An Obama administration will have even less taste for individual liberties than the Clinton one.  If you liked Waco and Ruby Ridge, you are going to love it when Obama decides to take people down.  He&#8217;s got the integrity of Clinton, but with the arrogance and competence of Carter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20477</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20477</guid>
		<description>Just to make sure I was remembering right, I looked up the original full video of the Q&amp;A with Joe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXmN0K-hkq4</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to make sure I was remembering right, I looked up the original full video of the Q&amp;A with Joe.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXmN0K-hkq4" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXmN0K-hkq4</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20475</guid>
		<description>When I saw the video they were both standing well away from any houses, more like in a crowd in the street. Also, I failed to see any way that Obama&#039;s answer differed from his publically stated positions, so I don&#039;t understand how they would be considered an &quot;unforced error&quot;.

It seems to me that McCain&#039;s mention of Joe the Plumber so many times during his debate and speeches afterward basically invited/tempted the press to prove him wrong. McCain even apologized to Joe during his appearance on Letterman.

It also appeared to me that Joe enjoyed the attention from the press, until the negative publically available information about him began to surface. Having been on the receiving end of a press feeding frenzy after my father&#039;s death, I know how unpleasant they can be. I don&#039;t see any evidence of Obamafascism as much as the &quot;normal&quot; workings of biased media after a story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw the video they were both standing well away from any houses, more like in a crowd in the street. Also, I failed to see any way that Obama&#8217;s answer differed from his publically stated positions, so I don&#8217;t understand how they would be considered an &#8220;unforced error&#8221;.</p>
<p>It seems to me that McCain&#8217;s mention of Joe the Plumber so many times during his debate and speeches afterward basically invited/tempted the press to prove him wrong. McCain even apologized to Joe during his appearance on Letterman.</p>
<p>It also appeared to me that Joe enjoyed the attention from the press, until the negative publically available information about him began to surface. Having been on the receiving end of a press feeding frenzy after my father&#8217;s death, I know how unpleasant they can be. I don&#8217;t see any evidence of Obamafascism as much as the &#8220;normal&#8221; workings of biased media after a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20327</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 00:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20327</guid>
		<description>It diverts the attention from the bad answer.  It&#039;s the classic &quot;attack the messanger&quot; approach.

I agree that it&#039;s probably not the best approach, but the Obamafascists have a surprisingly limited repertoire.  They know that there are only so many lies about Obama himself that people will swallow, particularly regarding a completely unforced error like this.  So the only thing they can do is try to demonize the person who &quot;caused&quot; the error.  Thus, even though this guy did not seek out Obama but instead Obama *went to his house,* he must be a plant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It diverts the attention from the bad answer.  It&#8217;s the classic &#8220;attack the messanger&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s probably not the best approach, but the Obamafascists have a surprisingly limited repertoire.  They know that there are only so many lies about Obama himself that people will swallow, particularly regarding a completely unforced error like this.  So the only thing they can do is try to demonize the person who &#8220;caused&#8221; the error.  Thus, even though this guy did not seek out Obama but instead Obama *went to his house,* he must be a plant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20295</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20295</guid>
		<description>So how would attacking Joe, and drawing more attention to a bad answer, help cover up the bad answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how would attacking Joe, and drawing more attention to a bad answer, help cover up the bad answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20291</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20291</guid>
		<description>Nope.  The Obama people started trying to destroy him immediately.  They knew that Obama had made a big mistake in letting his true agenda slip out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  The Obama people started trying to destroy him immediately.  They knew that Obama had made a big mistake in letting his true agenda slip out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20253</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20253</guid>
		<description>Do you think that his question to Obama had more to do with the media scrutiny than the 2 dozen references from McCain during the debate? I didn&#039;t see anything about his life getting turned upside down until after the debates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that his question to Obama had more to do with the media scrutiny than the 2 dozen references from McCain during the debate? I didn&#8217;t see anything about his life getting turned upside down until after the debates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325&#038;cpage=1#comment-20251</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.billoblog.com/?p=325#comment-20251</guid>
		<description>It was never hidden.  It was just ignored by the media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was never hidden.  It was just ignored by the media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
