Categories

Search

Add to Technorati Favorites

Proud veteran of the United States Army

(AFIP deactivated with Walter Reed under BRAC, SEP 2011, Office of the Armed Forces Medical Examiner reactivated as Armed Forces Medical Examiner System (AFMES) under US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command)

(PROFIS to units below)

(520th TAML was deactivated in 2004 to form 1st and 9th AML)

On capital punishment

December 14th, 2005 by admin

So, now it’s over. The circus surrounding the execution of Tookie Williams is done. Whenever one of these executions occurs is one of the few times I’m not pleased to be a conservative.

It always amazes me when people who claim to be Christians applaud the ritual killing of others. We, as Christians, are people whose fundamental symbol is the wrongful application of capital punishment. Yet so many conservative Christians are eager to embrace this atrocity.

The bottom line is that there is *no* justification in the New Testament for capital punishment. Quite the opposite. While a good argument can be made for self defense — Christ Himself told his disciples to carry swords for self defense — *every* principle in the New Testament requires that we abandon judicial execution.

There are, of course numerous examples of judicial execution in the New Testament. All of those that are successful are wrong — from the execution of Christ to the martyrdom of the Apostles. The only judicial execution that the Christ came upon he stopped and pardoned the condemned (the adulterous woman). And, of course, in every breath, Jesus condemns vengeance and retaliation killing.

Christian apologists for capital punishment use the numerous statements by Christ and Paul that we should respect the power of the state — but even those are belied by the fact that both Christ and the Apostles did not think twice about standing up to temporal powers when it came to matters of faith. The argument that Christians should uphold evil governmental policies without exercising moral judgement should be laughable on its face, yet Christian proponents of the death penalty are reduced to it. One commenter on the beatitudes notes that they are tactical advice to a subject people; any other action would result in genocide — as demonstrated by the disastrous rebellion shortly after the death of Jesus that resulted in the destruction of the Temple. But whether the beatitudes and the teachings on subjugation are tactical or basic divine principle, they do not justify complicity with evil.

Bereft of New Testament justification for these killings, pro-death Christians are forced to rely on Old Testament prooftexting. Unfortunately, that flies in the face of their own faith. These same Christians reject the law of Moses, yet end up quoting it as their guide in this and this only. And they would apply it selectively even here — would these Christians stone heretics, adulterors, etc.? I hope not.

No. A Christian perspective requires that one reject capital punishment.

There are secular justifications for capital punishment, but all have sand as a foundation. The deterrent value of capital punishment is uncertain. The argument from necessity to avoid inadvertent parole is simply specious. The argument from justice is a tautology.

It boils down to this. There are two reasons for capital punishment. Collective vengeance and revenge, and secular liturgy. Collective vengeance is not a matter of justice. It is a matter of revenge. We want to kill these people because it makes *us* feel good. And it does. To be honest, it *pleases* me way down deep when some scum gets a long fall from a short rope. That is my failing. More important, it is not a basis for enlightened jurisprudence. Otherwise we might as well start executing loud mouthed Democrats and people who drive slow in the left lane; they piss me off, too.

A greater argument can be made for the existence of a secular liturgy and sacrement. People who watch our courts a lot sometimes get a little cynical and note that it is as much theater as it is justice. And it is. But that’s OK, because that theater is a matter of ritual that serves the purpose of all such ritual — it establishes a cultural framework whereby we structure our social lives and collective identity. Such rituals are an important part of our shared conception of our society — along with the other rituals of going to the voting booth, of organized protests with stupid chants and silly signs, of dressing up like an idiot and drinking green beer until you vomit on Saint Patrick’s day, etc. These rituals are very important in creating the common experience of our culture. Ritual killing, to whatever gods, has been an important part of this in many cultures, and it is a hard habit to break.

But we, as Christians, have made a tradition of replacing old, bad customs and rituals with good Christ-centered customs and rituals. We have taken Yuletide and replaced it with Christmas, even if we keep the tree. We take the sacrifices to Ishtar and replace it with the worship of Easter, even if we keep the rabbit. And it’s about time we got rid of the last, and most heinous, tradition of ritual sacrifice to the gods of vengeance. The gallows and the cross have very different messages, and we should choose the latter.

Posted in Politics, Religion | No Comments »

No Responses

  1. Grace Says:

    Very well said.

  2. John Says:

    I’ve been a “student” of the capital punishment issue since the ’60s. It began with courses in sociology in college coupled with a more “liberal” theological background. The science of this punishment has been refuted in virtually every study. Retribution is the only justification.

    I cannot agree more that when one examines the teachings of Jesus there is absolutely no way one can come to the conclusion that capital punishment is justified. Forgiveness is absolutely central to my Christian perspective. That is not to say that there are not individuals that should never walk freely in society again. Indeed, there are many.

    Unfortunately, this argument will not be settled by calm, rational minds. WWJD: who would Jesus decapitate??

  3. Administrator Says:

    Well, I actually agree with Pope John Paul II in this matter, who said in his Evangelium Vitae in 1995:

    “…the nature and extent of the punishment must be carefully evaluated and decided upon and ought not go to the extreme of executing the offender except in cases of absolute necessity: In other words, when it would not be possible otherwise to defend society. Today, however as a result of steady improvements in the organization of the penal system, such cases are very rare, if not practically non-existent.”

    Jesus did not denounce self-defense. For instance, he instructed his followers to carry swords for self-defense. One commentator on this episode pointed out that this was an important tactical decision of Jesus. At the time he instructed his disciples to do this, he was strongly opposed by the religious establishment, but not by the Roman authorities. The Jewish establishment did not have the power of judicial execution, and instead often took care of things by the use of what would be called “death squads” today, who engaged in extrajudicial execution. Jesus did not want to be killed by a gang of thugs in a dark alley, and was prepared to defend against that, because His planned called for a judicial execution.

    In a society where the technology, infrastructure, or method for removing the threat of a person without killing him or her does not exist, a self-defense arguement can be made within a New Testament context. The technology, infrastructure, and methods *do* exist today.

  4. Tuesday’s Child » Blog Archive » I have so many topics to blog about Says:

    [...] to Billo’s post on Christmas, and what I started about peace which takes me back to another Billo post that he wrote recently on capital punishment which I thought was exc [...]

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.